<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Naked Hedge Fund &#187; Stock Fundamental Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/category/finance/stock-fundamentals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com</link>
	<description>Personal Finance and Investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:10:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cheap or Not Cheap?</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/finance/cheap-or-not-cheap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/finance/cheap-or-not-cheap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NHF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Fundamental Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundamental analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value investing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/?p=1792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of talk on both sides of the value fence lately.  The bulls and "value investors" are beating the drums of value everywhere the eye can see, while the bears are screaming its all fraud. 

Who to believe?  The "value investors" definitely lost a lot of street cred with the last meltdown as they were all the last ones to get out.  Explaining the whole way down to the bottom how stocks were cheap because they are always basing everything on old numbers and earnings expectations that can always fall off a cliff.  
More...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/finance/cheap-or-not-cheap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>INTC Earnings Prep</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-fundamentals/intc-earnings-prep/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-fundamentals/intc-earnings-prep/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NHF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Fundamental Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/?p=1469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the post is the earnings chart for Intel.  It shows the history of Intels earnings and upcoming expections with the stocks performance during the same period.  As you can see in the  chart below the earnings difference year over year for the upcoming earnings Thursday could be potentially huge if they meet expectations. The earnings outlook will be very interesting and important for the streets reaction as well.  The street expects $0.45 tomorrow evening.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-fundamentals/intc-earnings-prep/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alcoa Earnings Preview</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-fundamentals/alcoa-earnings-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-fundamentals/alcoa-earnings-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NHF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Fundamental Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/?p=1458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alcoa kicks off earnings tonight.  Obviously the industry that Alcoa falls into has been red hot as of late with the falling dollar.  It will be interesting to see what the numbers look like.  Below is a chart showing the earnings expectations and the past earnings of the last year or so with a back lay of the stocks chart.  The year over year comparison of Q4 earnings has the potential to spark a rally based on validation of Alcoa turning the corner from the depths of last March.  2008 Q4 earnings  -$0.28 and the expectations for 2009 Q4 is $0.05, which is quite a difference and even more so for next quarter if they set positive outlooks.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-fundamentals/alcoa-earnings-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Naked Hedge Fund Weekly</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-tech-analysis/naked-hedge-fund-weekly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-tech-analysis/naked-hedge-fund-weekly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NHF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NHF Weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Fundamental Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Technical Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/?p=1334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Naked Hedge Fund Weekly report.  PDF on post.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-tech-analysis/naked-hedge-fund-weekly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meredith Whitney Downgrades Goldman</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-fundamentals/meredith-whitney-downgrades-goldman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-fundamentals/meredith-whitney-downgrades-goldman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NHF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Fundamental Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/?p=1277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Meredith threw a curve ball at the overly optimistic market with fresh downgrade on Goldman Sachs from a buy to a Neutral.  Normally this kind of thing doesn't matter to us here because most analysts are completely off base or in the companies pocket, but Meredith has proven herself in the recent past.  Her reasoning behind the downgrade follows a theme of "Why be greedy" in that the price of GS has already met her year target price ($186)  in the matter of months.  Thanks to ZeroHedge for making this document available.

Actual note from Meredith Whitneys Advisory Group on the post.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nakedhedgefund.com/stock-analysis/stock-fundamentals/meredith-whitney-downgrades-goldman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
